David Reads “John James Audubon,” by Stephen Vincent Benét

John James Audubon
John James Audubon

Last night I had the freaky little dream. I must have been thinking of yesterday’s post about the Juvenile bald eagles I saw because I dreamed that high in the air above me was soaring an adult bald eagle with a very distinct white head and tail. For a moment I was sure that I was actually outside in a field somewhere. The sky was bright blue in the background (yes, I think I do dream in color), and the body and wings of the eagle were a chocolate-brown. Then it registered. The shape of the wings, and I knew it was just a dream.

Adult Bald Eagle over the West  Branch of the Susquehanna near Sunbury, PA
Adult Bald Eagle over the West Branch of the Susquehanna. (Photo by Brian Shaffer)

Bald eagles do not hold their wings the way this bird did, not in a full soar, not while flapping against a headwind, not while diving for a fish, or mating in mid-air. The shape and position were completely wrong. A real bald eagle has long, plank-like wings that have a  very straight leading edge, as in the pictured here. But the bird in my dream had its tail feathers fanned widely out like a cooper’s hawk, and its wings were swept forward like a red-shouldered hawk.

I lay there thinking, “Well, isn’t that queer? I guess I’m having a dream.” Then instantly I awoke to see, Milton the cat staring at me by my pillow, politely awaiting my journey to the kitchen for coffee at which time I always fill his feed dish.

Cats Fighting, by John James Audubon
Cats Fighting, by John James Audubon

So, because I like to connect the un-connectable, I thought today would be the perfect day for a poem about a man who traveled, collected data, drew and painted and eventually inspired the work of folks like Roger Tory Peterson, creator of the bible of birding identification, the Peterson Field Guide to Birds, and eventually people like Pete Dunn who’s book Hawks in Flight taught me exactly how an eagle holds its wings in flight. Of course a lot of those things you learn by observing, like they did, but Pete showed me what to look for.

John James Audubon was born on April 26th, 1785, so we’re a bit early in celebrating his birthday, but after all the poets whose birthdays I let slip by in March, it’s probably best I get on this early and talk about him now.

This poem was written by Stephen Vincent Benét, Pulitzer Prize winner and author of “The Devil and Daniel Webster” and “The King of Cats.” Speaking of Cats, did you know that Audubon also had sketched and painted cats? Yeah, his wife Lucy couldn’t quite believe it either, and as my friend Ricky says in the comments below, this poem is probably more about her than about him anyway.

From a time when the word queer meant strange or eccentric, here is poem number six in my NaPoRecMo series, “John James Audubon,” by Stephen Vincent Benét :

John James Audubon

Some men live for warlike deeds,
Some for women’s words.
John James Audubon
Lived to look at birds.

Pretty birds and funny birds,
All our native fowl
From the little cedar waxwing
To the Great Horned Owl.

Let the wind blow hot or cold,
Let it rain or snow,
Everywhere the birds went
Audubon would go.

Scrambling through a wilderness,
Floating down a stream,
All around America
In a feathered dream.

Thirty years of traveling,
Pockets often bare,
(Lucy Bakewell Audubon
Patched them up with care).

Followed grebe and meadowlark,
Saw them sing and splash.
(Lucy Bakewell Audubon
Somehow raised the cash).

Drew them all the way they lived
In their habitats.
(Lucy Bakewell Audubon
Sometimes wondered “Cats?”)

Colored them and printed them
In a giant book,
Birds of North America”—
All the world said, “Look!”

Gave him medals and degrees,
Called him noble names,
—Lucy Bakewell Audubon
Kissed her queer John James.

by Stephen Vincent Benét

12 Comments Add yours

  1. angryricky says:

    Watching this Cluzaud documentary is the closest I’ve ever come to birding. As a result, I don’t dream about eagles, of any sort, realistic or otherwise.
    Probably also as a result, I see the Benet poem as primarily about Mrs Audubon–she seems more fully realized to me than he does. The portions about him tend to elide the subject of the verbs, so he disappears, while Benet repeats her name over and over again, insisting on her presence, however parenthetical she may have seemed.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I haven’t watched that documentary, but I’ll give it a look. These are wonderful and astute observations about the poem. I love it when a post gets you talking like this. 🙂 Very smart to make the parenthetical person in the poem the real subject, isn’t it?


    2. angryricky says:

      I wonder if it was Benet’s original intention, or if his writing got away from him, as if so often does to others.


    3. I don’t know. She doesn’t show up for several stanzas, so maybe it was something that developed?


    4. theoccasionalman says:

      I love the fact that you just clicked Like on this recently. I also like to reread journal entries, and the comments and conversations they lead to. (hug) I hope you’re well.

      Liked by 1 person

    5. Well, I did a totally new post last night that used this recording, and wanted to link back here. I enjoyed reading back over the old comments. 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

  2. John says:

    I like your reading …. a sense of fun in your voice. Very nice.

    I perhaps need to study birds more … i like birds, and know a bit about exotics, because at one time I had a few as pets. Mostly, though, when I see a bird the conversation is pretty much “Oh, look. A bird. Pretty.”

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m glad to hear that! There was just a twinge of worry at first about whether or not I was giving was being too playful at first, but I think it works. And tying this in with Ricky’s comment, in which it seems that Mrs. Audubon is the real subject of the poem, it still leaves him likable, maybe lovable even, if enigmatic. It is enough that she loved him and was devoted, despite what the poem presents so well as eccentricity. And so we come to like her, and if she loves his queer ways, it’s easier for us to do so. Sometimes the seemingly “light” poems give the greatest depths of human understanding.


    2. And birds have been a ridiculous obsession with me, John. Though I haven’t given them much time since my return to school last year, and my subsequent recuperation this year. But it’s time for me to hit the bogs, ponds, woods and ridge-tops again. So much going on that we don’t even see, until it flits by in full color. 🙂


  3. I’m enjoying how you do a brilliant job reading both a metrical rhymed poem like this one, and a free-verse (though as you point out, carefully lineated) one like Whitman’s “Dalliance.”

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I may not fit into my hat tomorrow if you keep this up. But seriously, I do put some thought into these. Sometimes too much, but in light of my belief that poetry is meant to be spoken, even if only in a whisper sometimes, I kind of have these theories, that whether the poet would read it the same way or not, the way it goes on paper is some indication of how the poem should sound. So affirmation like this really does mean a great deal to me. I’m glad I pulled it off.


Talk to me:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.